Photo credit: Supreme Court Pediment by Flickr.com user Kevin Harber

Fact-checking Sarah Palin's newest op-ed.

Marc Ambinder has a point-by-point rebuttal of Sarah Palin's latest column in the Washington Post:
Remember, the "revelation" was born from an potentially illegal e-mail hack. "So-called" -- untrue. These are experts. Their science has been validated, independently. Their "actions" here consist of insulting climate change skeptics, immature name-calling, and, at worst, devising a strategy to keep the climate change deniers out of debates and peer-reviewed journals. The "concerns" that Palin speaks of are the result of years of accumulated science denialism that now, conveniently, has been seemingly "validated" by the fog of a grand conspiracy, suddenly revealed.
Read the rest here.